The S&P 500’s Shakiest Dividend

By Carla Pasternak



Yield and Earnings Power


Dividend Coverage and Outlook


The Shakiest Dividend in the S&P 500



— Advertisement —


Make Money in All Markets


Leverage your investments in both up and down markets
with our newest publication, Cabot Options Trader. Get top options trading
picks each week that can help you make money in any market. The first issue was
released yesterday–don’t miss it! Click below to order now.



Note from Cabot Wealth Advisory Editor Elyse Andrews:
Occasionally, we bring you articles from guest editors that we think you will
enjoy and benefit from. Today, you’ll hear from Carla Pasternak, Chief Investment
Strategist of High-Yield Investing at StreetAuthority, as she discusses the
criteria for the S&P 500’s dividend that is most likely to be cut. I hope
you enjoy it!



Normally I’m hunting down the brightest spots for you to
lock in income streams and capital gains. But with the recent market
happenings, I wanted to do something a little different.


I wrote an article called the “Safest Dividend in
the S&P” for Cabot Wealth Advisory on April 6. (You can read it here: )


But there’s a flipside to that coin. If you now know the
safest dividends in the S&P, shouldn’t you also know the least safe …
especially given the clear signals that this economic rough patch isn’t over


With this in mind, I’ve taken the criteria I used to uncover
the safest stocks, and put it to use to uncover which S&P 500 stocks might
be the most in danger of a dividend cut.



Safety Criteria #1: Yield


It only makes sense that our search starts with the most
important factor–yield. There may be some stocks out there currently yielding
2%-3% and in danger of cutting their dividend, but those don’t really catch my


Instead, I sorted through all of the S&P 500 common
stocks to find those yielding above 6%–these are the stocks that income investors
are likely to have in their portfolios. I found a total of 14 stocks yielding
above 6% (2.8% of the S&P).


Now that we’ve found a select few companies to focus on,
we can move to our next factor of dividend safety: earnings power.


Safety Criteria #2: Earnings Power

It’s “Dividends 101” that a company’s earnings
are what fund its payments. So if we’re looking for sick dividends, it only
makes sense to find those companies seeing problems with their earnings.


Now, some people simply use net income for this step, but
I prefer to look at operating income. Operating income is the profit realized
from the company’s day-to-day operations, excluding one-time events or special
cases. This metric usually gives a better sense of a company’s growth than
earnings per share, which can be manipulated to show stronger results.


Taking our original 14 candidates, I searched Bloomberg
for those that have seen negative operating income growth over the last year.
Eight members of our original list have seen a drop:


Frontier Communications (NYSE: FTR)

Operating Income Growth: -1.2%

Yield: 12.1%


Federated Investors (NYSE: FII)

Operating Income Growth: -8.5%

Yield: 10.1%


Diamond Offshore (NYSE: DO)

Operating Income Growth: -2.0%

Yield: 10.0%


Windstream (NYSE: WIN)

Operating Income Growth: -13.8%

Yield: 9.1%


Reynolds America (NYSE: RAI)

Operating Income Growth: -2.5%

Yield: 6.8%



Operating Income Growth: -6.8%

Yield: 6.8%


Pepco Holdings (NYSE: POM)

Operating Income Growth: -8.9%

Yield: 6.8%


Qwest Communications (NYSE: Q)

Operating Income Growth: -5.8%

Yield: 6.0%


Keep in mind that just because a company shows up on this
list, it doesn’t mean their dividend is in danger–it simply means they are
high yielding and operating income dropped over the last year.


— StreetAuthority Advertisement —


Lock in 10% Yields with the Rarest Securities on Earth


These securities are so unusual that people don’t even
know what to call them. They’re not stocks, bonds, trusts, partnerships, ETFs
or mutual funds. At High-Yield Investing, we just call them
PCMs–“Perpetual Cash Machines.” They’re so enticing that we’re
releasing an entire report.


To get your copy, go here.



Safety Criteria #3: Dividend Coverage


No measure of dividend safety carries as much weight as
the payout ratio. By comparing the amount of profit earned against how much is
paid in dividends, we can know whether a company can continue paying its
current yield, even if conditions worsen.


Below, I’ve listed those stocks with payout ratios above
90%. Anything above 100% means the company is paying out more than it earns,
increasing the likelihood of a future cut.


Company — Payout Ratio for most recent quarter

Diamond Offshore (NYSE: DO) — 96%

AT&T (NYSE: T) — 100%

Pepco Holdings (NYSE: POM) — 167%

Qwest Communications (NYSE: Q) — 400%


Safety Criteria #4: Outlook and Other Factors


Simply because a company is seeing slowing business
conditions and a high payout ratio doesn’t automatically mean a cut is coming.
In fact, many companies have a sense of pride in maintaining their dividend
payouts–even in the face of adversity.


So to pinpoint what could be the shakiest dividend in the
S&P 500, I decided to take a look at a few different factors that could
give a hint to a future cut. This includes earnings forecasts, cash positions,
dividend history, and anything else that might tip the scales one way or


Blue-chip AT&T paid out slightly more than it earned
in the first quarter (for a payout ratio of 100%), but I think the chances of a
cut are doubtful. The company has more than $2.6 billion in cash it can use,
and also has a proud history of increasing payments to investors. Factor in
that depreciation costs (a non-cash charge that impacts earnings, but not cash
available to pay dividends) are substantial, and I think the chances of a cut
are further reduced.


Pepco, an energy company, is certainly an interesting
situation. The company paid out $60 million in dividends in the first quarter,
but earned only $36 million. While that raises a red flag, the company has more
than $1.2 billion in retained earnings, which it can dip into if needed to fund
any shortfall. Given that the first quarter performance appears to be an aberration,
as Pepco has plenty of retained earnings, and a track record of maintaining the
dividend, I think the payment is safe for now.


Qwest, which has paid out as much or more in dividends
than it has earned for nearly a year, almost took the crown as the shakiest
dividend. But it does sit on more than $1 billion in cash–and recently
announced a takeover by CenturyTel (NYSE: CTL). With the cash hoard and a
takeover on the horizon, the chances of a dividend cut now appear slim.


Which brings us to our final candidate–Diamond Offshore.


Diamond Offshore, an oil and gas drilling contractor,
earned $2.09 per share in the first quarter while paying $2.00 in dividends,
for a payout ratio of 96%. Meanwhile, earnings are estimated to fall more than
15% this year, according to Yahoo! estimates.


In fact, the company has already beat me to the
punch–cutting quarterly dividends to $1.50 per share to compensate for the
less-than-rosy outlook. While that certainly helps, I’m not so sure it’s
positively the end of dividend cuts.


The biggest drag is the cloudy outlook on offshore
drilling given the recent disaster off the coast of Louisiana. Diamond has
heavy exposure to the region, and there’s no telling just yet what (if any) new
regulations will be imposed and how they will impact business. In fact, the
share price has already fallen from about $90 to $60 on the fears.


Diamond Offshore does carry a large cash balance of
nearly $1 billion, which should help secure the dividend for the time being,
but with clouds on the horizon, this is one income stream that I would pass up
for now.


Good Investing!


Carla Pasternak

Dividend Opportunities


P.S. There is still plenty of hope for income investors.
Carla has uncovered several picks with secure dividends that are yielding up to
22.7%. For more on these picks just follow this link.




You must be logged in to post a comment.